Business Continuity Planning & Six Sigma | |||
![]() Interim (project) Management Lean Six Sigma Trainingen Certificering Lean Six Sigma (pilot) projecten Implementatie Verbeterprogramma's Subsidies ![]() Business Process Management Six Sigma LEAN Performance Management ![]() Gecertificeerd Black Belt worden Gecertificeerd Green Belt worden Lean Six Sigma implementeren Een Tool- & Specialty Training volgen ![]() Master Black Belts Black Belt ![]() Six Sigma e.a. kwaliteitsmodellen Continuity Planning & Six Sigma Verslag Seminar Certificering 2 Black Belts ING ![]() Interessante links |
Business Continuity Planning and Six Sigma
Artikel afkomstig van www.continuitycentral.com
The first thing we must understand is that Six Sigma does nothing until the organisation wanting to use it makes a commitment to the methodology. Once this happens, the process is simply one of using the methodology to achieve improvement. The one part often overlooked is that Six Sigma is focused on continuous improvement, so the process is never ending. It is the constant striving to take what you are doing today and improve it. Can Six Sigma be used for improving business continuity, security and emergency management? Yes it can. One must start with the DMAIC process taught within Six Sigma as a disciplined approach to project management. DMAIC stands for, Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, and Control.
Six Sigma combined with a proven vulnerability assessment method The quest for data The chart below shows the merging of the DMAIC process with a proven security vulnerability assessment format. The assessment format seeks to know who the adversary is and what scenarios may be used to interrupt the business or harm the people. It bases improvement on achieving a balanced and layered security plan. Most importantly, it uses internal and external data.
The initial assessment and plan development will use both sources of data. After the initial assessment and development of the security plan, the “continuous improvement loop” provides for analysis of how we are doing and gives us the basis for making changes to improve. However, we are only improving based on the external data used in the initial assessment. External factors may, and will change. Maybe some new adversaries, maybe new information from Homeland Security. Whatever the change, we must bring that information, the data, into our improvement loop. The new information is combined with existing data and an assessment is made as to the impact on our plan. Conclusion |
||